Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/European-Latin American Technology Platforms


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 03:44, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

European-Latin American Technology Platforms

 * – ( View AfD View log )

PROD declined without asserting  notability. Concern = Non notable organisation, and advertising or promotion. (WP:ORG and WP:ADVERT) Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:33, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 15:03, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 15:04, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 15:04, 30 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 7 October 2011 (UTC)




 * Delete. Few hits at all, none WP:RS that I can see. It seems as though EU might actually be spending a fair chunk of cash on this, so perhaps there exist RS's, but can't assume this. Would help if article were less in bureaucratese. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 01:11, 7 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete/Speedy Little/nothing in the way of sources (all seem to be primary); article reads like an advert for the project. Not Enyclopaedic yet as a subject - may become that way in a year's time?  Sources may be available then.  Pesky  ( talk  …stalk!) 06:42, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:24, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.