Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/European Cricket Network


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:17, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

European Cricket Network

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable sporting organisation, has no jurisdiction over cricket in Europe which is the remit of the European Cricket Council, lacks any wider notability. Harrias (he/him) • talk 15:36, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions.  Harrias  (he/him) • talk 15:36, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: After revision deletion there is no way that this organization is notable at the slightest; the only source provided is likely promotional. HarukaAmaranth 春香 18:20, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Europe,  and Switzerland.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  19:27, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Not noteable.--AAonlyA (talk) 20:33, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per HarukaAmaranth. This organisation has no governing remit over cricket in Europe. StickyWicket aka AA (talk) 06:20, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment - makes no odds if it "lacks remit" or "lacks jurisdiction", the criteria for notability and inclusion is being noted in reliable sources. That's the only point to discuss. I've been able to find a few sources that could be discussed for reliability including 1 and 2 and 3. I think there are probably more. JMWt (talk) 07:40, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Although there is some sourcing, I don't believe there is enough here to suggest notability. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:11, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Despite some sources, the organization's lack of governing remit over European cricket, alongside insufficient evidence of notability, supports its removal. --Rodgers V (talk) 13:08, 1 November 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.