Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/European Esperanto Union


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Mediran ( t  •  c ) 00:22, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

European Esperanto Union

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't seem to be a significant organization. Wikipedia isn't a dumping ground for every organization that has a small conference every couple of years or takes out an ad in a French paper. Article appears to be a permastub, and probably should be merged with another Esperanto article. A7 CSD was declined. p b  p  16:30, 14 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment I tried finding sources in English, and while my search wasn't exhaustive, I was only able to find one additional source: Tongues are loosened at Esperanto conference in Galway. But given the nature of topic, there may be many additional sources but not in English.  We should take some extra care to make sure that this topic isn't notable in non-English speaking countries before deleting.  A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 17:21, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: I asked the editors of our Language Reference Desk to see if they can find any non-English sources. A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 17:42, 14 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. This is an active organization, with representation on European Commission integration platforms, and with relevance to the most important international auxiliary language in the world. A web search of the organization's actual name, instead of the English translation yields hundreds more results. The article can be significantly expanded to cover meetings and the linguistic developments arising from them, not to mention its continued involvement in larger discussions of European integration. VanIsaacWS Vexcontribs 23:32, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable organization. 86.128.5.222 (talk) 00:22, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per the above rationale. --JorisvS (talk) 09:58, 16 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:40, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:40, 15 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep VanIsaac makes a good case. And the media does cover some of their activities, they worth mentioning surely.   D r e a m Focus  20:50, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. I count three interwiki links. Shii (tock) 08:00, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable, and being improved.--DThomsen8 (talk) 16:23, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.