Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/European Flavours & Fragrances


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:59, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

European Flavours & Fragrances

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject doesn't appear to be notable. Nominated for CSD twice, and the article appears to have been created via AfC, but I'm not sure if whether it's been properly accepted or not. Adam9007 (talk) 02:36, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as this is still A7 and G11 material but the nominator apparently believes being "an accredited member" is sufficient (they are violating their interaction ban against me as it is) . This has nothing at all for independent notability and substance. I'll also note this was actually moved to mainspace by the author themselves, a recent concern regarding Drafts, so it was never actually reviewed (the author moved it twice without consultation of reviewers).  SwisterTwister   talk  02:37, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I have striked out part of the statement above, as there is no interaction ban in-place between Adam9007 and SwisterTwister.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   01:49, 1 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The nominator? You mean me? Interaction ban? To whom are you referring? I'm not on an interaction ban with anyone. Oh, and I'm not the only one who's contested the A7. Adam9007 (talk) 02:40, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note for closing admin: No one else ever actually contested an A7 here, and I have kindly asked the user to stay away from me given they continuously remove my changes (see User_talk:Adam9007/Archive_2); one other time before I mentioned my concerns about their removing my changes, also. SwisterTwister   talk  02:56, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Did you read the talk page? Adam9007 (talk) 02:59, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:33, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:33, 30 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete should have died at CSD - David Gerard (talk) 09:58, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. I don't see any in-depth coverage. One of its products was nominated for FiFi Awards, I don't think that cuts it. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:38, 30 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.