Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/European Huntington's Disease Network


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Star  Mississippi  02:14, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

European Huntington's Disease Network

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

In every version since 2011, this has been sourced in the main to the organization's own WWW site, and peripherally to articles, some by Landwehrmeyer, that are about Huntingdon's disease itself and study results. Looking around, I cannot actually find anything that isn't press releases, the organization's own WWW site, regurgitations of the organization's own WWW site (helpfully marked as from the organization's own WWW site), interviews with Landwehrmeyer, or Landwehrmeyer writing about this. The world just hasn't independently documented this. The fact that there's just been an edit war over how the article isn't true because it no longer matches the organization's own WWW site is just the icing on the cake when it comes to indications that no-one has documented this but the organization itself and its founder. If the sole source of truth is autobiographical, it is not appropriate for Wikipedia. Uncle G (talk) 21:06, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Germany. Shellwood (talk) 21:09, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness and Medicine.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:11, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. I believe my uncle is correct. Drmies (talk) 21:34, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete No secondary coverage. Search shows passing mentions as participant in research projects, but that’s it. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:35, 8 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.