Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/European Newspaper Publishers Association


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 01:23, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

European Newspaper Publishers Association

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Queried speedy delete Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:17, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not one single in-text reference, and if the number of employees is indeed true, I don't think it is notable enough. The current content of the article is quite confusing for me, and seems mostly unreliable. תחי מדינת ישראל (talk) 16:22, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Europe-wide international trade association. Lots of references at Google News archive, but the copyvio material should be cut down to a stub. --Eastmain (talk) 16:24, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep as I said on the talk page, there is some RS coverage about the Association to build an article. Current author has an admitted COI and this article is not encyclopedic but that doesn't mean there can't be one. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 16:28, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - I first ran across this as a copyvio speedy delete. The author was attempting to release the content through OTRS which I followed up on but they enver followed through.  Appears to be a notable organization, but the article would need some work to fix POV issues from the COI.  Chris  lk02  Chris Kreider 17:03, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep A notable organisation, with very well-known members (shout out to the Associação Portuguesa de Imprensa!). This needs a good rewrite and referencing. Ecoleetage (talk) 20:19, 3 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.