Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/European Union's MySpace profile


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete ~ trialsanderrors 09:21, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

European Union's MySpace profile


Notwithstanding the notability of the MySpace account holder, I can't imagine individual profiles are encyclopedic. Ginkgo 100 talk 21:38, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge - It's at least an interesting tidbit for the EU article, provided the account is actually maintained by the Union. RobertbcoleBobby Contributions/Robertbcole 21:47, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, no merge. Obviously, previous voter didn't read the article carefully. Although this EU My Space looks more like a student's show-off or prank (eg. the EU MySpace profile statistics "The European Union has 0 friends." or "Male, 55" do read kinda funny), it did receive some press coverage. `'mikkanarxi 22:04, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I think I'm going to make a MySpace profile for the League of Nations. (But seriously, I doubt this will pass the "100 year" test.) Caknuck 22:08, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete This is self-admittedly not the EU's myspace, it's not owned, run by, or contributed to by anyone affiliated with the EU, it's just a student gimmick &mdash; WP:NFT. All those references except this one have "blog" in the url. Also seems to be a case of WP:COI from the creator's name. Demiurge 22:19, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - worthles. confusing. crap. - Femmina 07:03, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

To those of you who have voted for deleting the article: Would it change your opinion if the EU decides to take over the profile? /MM 08:55, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - if it was the offical page of the EU or made by somebody notable for satire (as opposed to random attempts at humor), then there might be a case for keeping it. Koweja 00:32, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as the EU has nothing to do with it, and MySpace accounts set up by Danish students tend to be non-notable and fail WP:WEB. B.Wind 01:42, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:NOT for random jokes made up on Myspace one day. Sandstein 05:46, 28 November 2006 (UTC) -- PS: Yes, it's said to have gotten media coverage, but really, we don't have to cover every fad from the funny pages. Sandstein 05:48, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I would since it would go from being a highschooler's prank to an official project of the EU. One is notable the other is not. Koweja 13:39, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I would still vote delete because it's simply not encyclopedic. I removed the speedy tag and sent it here because the author made some claims to notability, but I don't think they are valid claims. --Ginkgo 100 talk 21:20, 28 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete I first nominated this article as a speedy deletion candidate. Notwihstanding the efforts by the editor to remediate the article, to my mind it still fails the notability test. LittleOldMe 13:16, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as blogspam --timecop 00:01, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep There is verifiable information about this, thus, it is a keepable as all the random two-man band pages everywhere.
 * Comment - please add a link to all the "random two-man band" pages you know of on wikipedia to my talkpage as I'm a very big fan of "random two-man bands". - Femmina 07:08, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete blogspam -- Koptor 00:11, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to MySpace if anything, otherwise Delete -- Tawker 07:19, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete If this profile is worth adding then so is all the other thousands of myspace users. --Amanduhh 21:20, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non notable webpage. --- RockMFR 07:21, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.