Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/European route E97


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) BusterD (talk) 19:06, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

European route E97

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No indication of noteability provided through secondary sources. No sources or references at all, for that matter. Also, WP:INDISCRIMINATE-- while the road network itself may be noteable in some fashion, this individual branch certainly doesn't seem to be. Jtrainor (talk) 16:05, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to International E-road network as a plausable search term.  Lugnuts  (talk) 16:44, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 13:38, 15 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep if additional content from uk:Автошлях E97, nl:Europese weg 97, no:Europavei 97, pl:E97 (trasa europejska), ru:Европейский маршрут E97, or sv:E97 can be translated over. Short≠delete.  Imzadi 1979  →   20:46, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per above by Imzadi 1979--Tomobe03 (talk) 22:08, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (country)-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 16 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep per Inzadi1979. Per WP:LENGTH, the 64k+ size International E-road network article is already too long to have this content merged to it. --Oakshade (talk) 03:32, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. If the article with an obviously notable subject is underdeveloped it is not the reason to delete it. Grey Hood   Talk  11:17, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
 * That's the thing- this is not 'obviously noteable' at all. It's some road somewhere. None of the external links and references added prove it's noteability. Jtrainor (talk) 08:46, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Look at the Template:E-road. Obviously all E-roads are notable, and even if some articles lack references they should exists for the sake of consistency and full coverage of the topic. Grey Hood   Talk  12:39, 21 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep per Greyhood. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 07:29, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.