Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Europeanization of the Scriptures


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tim Song (talk) 02:39, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Europeanization of the Scriptures

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This article is not about what it purports to be. Issues regarding Bible translation belong in Bible version debate, whereas the title of this article claims a much wider scope. But much of what is said would not apply to translation in other European languages. StAnselm (talk) 03:38, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - No sources provided establishing notability of topic. The nature of the topic makes independent searches for notability problematic at best.  Much or all of the article appears to be original research or at the very least unsourced.  No clear rationale is provided for why this material can't be dealt with in existing Bible articles, making it an impermissible content fork. - DustFormsWords (talk) 03:59, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wrong title, badly written, any nuggets of usefulness that might exist here could easily exist in some other article (such as the Bible Version Debate mentioned above). David V Houston (talk) 14:10, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete; appears to be largely WP:SYNTH. *** Crotalus *** 17:16, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete This is covered better in other places in a more balanced way.--Savonneux (talk) 21:15, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:35, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per what's been said above. What's here belongs elsewhere, covered better, and the article title is a misnomer. Jclemens (talk) 01:59, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - if not original research, it reads like that. Bearian (talk) 22:03, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. No reliable references, breaches of WP:SYNTH and WP:NPOV, and redundancy in that the topic is covered better elsewhere. -- Radagast 3 (talk) 07:14, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete -- It looks to me like WP:OR. Two of the references cite sources with "Koran" (or similar) which suggest a WP:POV.  Peterkingiron (talk) 15:11, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.