Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eurowhite


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 23:19, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Eurowhite

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Seems very WP:MADEUP. No sources found besides Wiki. If not MADEUP, very "slang" like. T ofutwitch11  (T ALK ) 19:54, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete under WP:NEO. The slang term IS used, but the word is also the name of several other companies and products.  In all cases, none of them have enough coverage.  Two years from now, I wouldn't be shocked if the word was more common, but for today, it is not.  Dennis Brown (talk) 20:25, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - This six year old article has never had any references. It is a non-notable subject as evidenced by the lack of WP:RS. In searching on this all I could find on topic were blogs, forums and other WP:SPS sources. It does seem to be a plane-spotting sub-culture jargon term, but that doesn't make it encyclopedic, if it were there would be refs available. It isn't even common enough as slang to be in the Urbandictionary.com. It certainly looks as if it is all WP:OR. - Ahunt (talk) 22:39, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:05, 3 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:GNG via a lack of verification by reliable sources, thus making it original research or something made up one day. Mjroots (talk) 05:16, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per Mjroots. Googling reveals no books, no news articles, and the only google search results seem to be forum posts or wiki clones and the like. Fails WP:GNG. -- Mûĸĸâĸûĸâĸû (blah?) 14:59, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per Mjroots. -- Joaquin008  ( talk ) 16:20, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete; Seems to be a neologism. Not notable. bobrayner (talk) 10:59, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, looks like an OR essay, and I can't find evidence of this term being in any meaningful circulation. Kyteto (talk) 10:36, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Reluctant Delete I was the one who originally de-prodded this knowing that the term is widely used in aviation circles, and to a lesser degree to describe a colour scheme overall and in an ethnographic sense as well. That being said, after searching for several days, the only references I could find were simply passing mentions, and since these aren't enough, I have to vote delete.  Ravendrop 17:33, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.