Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eusebio High School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 11:13, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Eusebio High School

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Same as the others, the article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NSCHOOL / (WP:ORGCRIT). Subject lacks WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV that address the subject directly and in-depth. BEFORE showed nothing with SIGCOV. The single source in the article is a one line entry from a government database. This is a normal school, looks like a nice one, but not an encyclopedic topic.  // Timothy :: talk  17:07, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  // Timothy :: talk  17:07, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.  // Timothy :: talk  17:07, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:08, 28 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete From what I can find the only things out there about this school are an article about a student from the school who got shot and a brief mention of it in a survey. Neither address the school directly or in-depth though. So it clearly fails the notability guidelines as a topic. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:38, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - falling short on WP:ORGCRIT; my searches have found that the school uses social media (which almost every school does these days), they have a couple of Wordpress sites, they have a passing mention in the news but little else. Searching Mataas na Paaralan ng Eusebio also yielded zero useful coverage. Schools are no longer presumed notable simply by existing and need to meet our notability criteria for organisations and I can see no evidence that this school has the depth of coverage required. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:58, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as there is nothing there, per GNG. GenQuest  "scribble" 13:15, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete nothing in books. The 49 total web results are database excerpts, social media, driving directions, and so on; nothing solid. Mathglot (talk) 18:01, 2 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.