Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Euston (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 08:43, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Euston (band)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Band fails WP:MUSIC, WP:GNG and WP:V. No extensive media coverage. No major label deal. No real assertion of any notability. Nouse4aname (talk) 09:28, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- Jack Merridew 10:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  --  I 'mperator 11:48, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Google and Google News searches find no reliable sources. Vague assertions of notability in the article are not enough to meet WP:MUSIC, and even the band offical site appears to show they are unsigned. A strong case of WP:GARAGE, methinks. sparkl!sm hey! 13:17, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I checked a library database of newspaper and magazine articles but could not find any sources that would help to establish WP:N notability. The "press clippings" section of the band's website does not offer much of substance either. The Gig Guide, which is a music magazine in Kent, provides a little but not enough. I recommend delete unless some other sources are offered before the end of this deletion discussion. Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 14:35, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.