Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eutropical subsea


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:32, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Eutropical subsea

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I can find no evidence these terms are used in the scientific literature, or even evidence that "subsea" is ever used as a noun (apparently referring to part of a sea). If kept, they should be merged together under Subsea (waterbody) or something; if deleted, Subsea (technology) should be moved back to Subsea, which currently incorrectly redirects to the disambiguated title. Mdewman6 (talk) 22:28, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Mdewman6 (talk) 22:28, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
 * The term "subsea" is used extensively in two articles with the same primary editor, Okeechobean Sea and Choctaw Sea. I am not sure how strongly the cited references support the use of the term, however. Mdewman6 (talk) 22:47, 5 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete I can find no uses whatsoever of this term except by Petuch. Given that the article was originally used as a coatrack for his vita, this looks like an attempt of promoting the term on WP prior to acceptance by anyone else. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 08:28, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Does this even exist? P l o r e k y  ( Got any problem? ) 11:07, 12 October 2022 (UTC+8)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.