Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eva Kwok


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was procedural keep ; see note below. Non-admin closure. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 16:31, 15 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Note, I'm closing as a procedural keep because the nominator is a sock and the nomination is a breaching experiment. Anyone who can clean up the mess, please help.  Bud I don't think it's even worth recording this as a deletion nomination.  - Wikidemon (talk) 12:49, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Eva Kwok

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Unsourced BLP. Has been unsourced since October 2005. PeterbrownDancin (talk) 02:34, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Previously AfD'ed: Articles for deletion/Eva L. Kwok Bradjamesbrown (talk) 02:49, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * That was back in 2005, when standards were presumably more lax. I dont think anyone even knew what a BLP was back then. PeterbrownDancin (talk) 02:50, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm completely aware of that. However, because it was under a slightly different title, the software didn't automatically add it; that's all the link was for.  I was able to find and add two sources of the "better than none" variety to the article. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 03:03, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Wow, that's awesome. Two sources added within twenty-nine minutes of being listed at AFD.  PeterbrownDancin (talk) 03:06, 15 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep. Peter Brown, you could have found those sources yourself. Drmies (talk) 03:07, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. Obviously notable. No longer a director of Bank of Montreal, although that doesn't make her any less notable. - Eastmain (talk • contribs) 08:26, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.