Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eva Navarro (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:42, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Eva Navarro
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable artist Karljoos (talk) 06:41, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, for now: Did you review the sources cited?  Most artists don't get multiple instances of coverage from a major paper like The Boston Globe.  Plus there seems to be a little more out there about her, which is why I deprodded it.  This reminded me of this current fiasco, so I figured discussion was at least appropriate.--Milowent (talk) 15:22, 2 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment: Of course I did review the sources (?!). Most of the sources are from a single source (The Boston Globe, 17th paper in the States by circulation), and references in the mentioned paper are limited to the last 2 paragraphs of a long article featuring another artist (September 14, 2006), an a short paragraph about exhibition of hers in a page listing several expositions (June 24, 2005). The other source is the artist's own website, which isn't really an independent source. I've googled "Eva Navarro" and haven't found much. Finally, this article seems to be an autobiography, as it was started by a user called Evanavarro. I think the notability of this artist is being pushed.--Karljoos (talk) 09:17, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Hmmm: You are likely correctly that the subject started the article. The artist's own website doesn't count as a source for notability, of course.  The link I added to her website is to a press article (in "EXPAT magazine", whatever that publication is) reposted on her website.  I'll see what other sources might exist of merit, if any. --Milowent (talk) 03:21, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:18, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:18, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Relisting comment. The article is a BLP so a second relist is reasonable. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep The press coverage listed here is sufficient to tip the scales. El Pais is a major daily newspaper in Spain, and she was on the edge anyways, following the Boston Globe coverage. The article may need cleanup as an autobio, however. Ray  Talk 02:56, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: The article in El Pasi is not about her. She is just mentioned once as part of a collective exhibition. She's not the main subject of the article. The article is not a review of her work.--Karljoos (talk) 08:22, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.