Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evaluating internet sources


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 23:15, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Evaluating internet sources

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Little more than an essay (sourced, but seems like a school report or something. Violated ban on how-to guides per WP:NOT. Angrysusan (talk) 19:16, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Pretty straight WP:HOWTO JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 19:26, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's a how-to, and it's also outdated. Yahoo! has not been a subject directory for many years, for instance. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 21:00, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - How-to article. &mdash; scetoaux (T|C)  21:05, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as a how-to, which is pretty sad since quite of bit of the content is well written. I wonder of the content might be useful at Wikihow?  --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 22:44, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per WP:NOT.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 20:05, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Per above. Is definitely an essay. Gary King ( talk )  20:13, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, essay, original research, and Google advocacy. KleenupKrew (talk) 10:13, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Transwiki! This is lovely stuff... for wikibooks or possibly even wikiversity, if either will have it. I can inquire if no one else wants to. Wikihow might well be interested as well. -- phoebe / (talk) 07:06, 21 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.