Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evangelical Reformed Church in Portugal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Possible merging and/or redirecting can be discussed on the article's talk page. Randykitty (talk) 13:44, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Evangelical Reformed Church in Portugal

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Deleted in pt.wiki after consensus at pt:Wikipédia:Páginas para eliminar/Igreja Reformada Evangélica em Portugal. The two references aren't sources anyway: first is the pt.wiki deleted page, and second isn't reliable. &mdash;Pórokhov Порох|undefined 04:40, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 05:20, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 05:20, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 05:20, 22 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Weak keep -- This is a denomination, though a very small one. The initial redlink can probably be replaced with something else, probably Dutch Reformed Church.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:28, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
 * All denominations are notable? &mdash;Pórokhov Порох|undefined 19:09, 22 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Merge into Protestantism in Portugal, which needs expansion. YBG (talk) 04:23, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
 * But is there a valid content in this page to merge it? I don't think so: one source is a Portuguese Wikipedia deleted (by me), and other isn't reliable.&mdash;Pórokhov Порох|undefined 06:52, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Are you saying that the information is inaccurate? If so, then the lack of WP:RS would be a good reason to delete instead of merge. On the other hand, if the information is verifiable just not verified, then the lack of WP:RS is not a reason to delete without merging, but rather a reason to merge and try to get better sources. YBG (talk) 07:02, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, inaccurate and without reliable sources. A search don't present relevant results.&mdash;Pórokhov Порох|undefined 02:46, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Nothing jumps out to me as being likely inaccurate. Maybe non-notable; perhaps the sources aren't WP:RS or independent, but to say it is inaccurate means that there is some information that you believe is false. What information do you believe to be false? YBG (talk) 03:34, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't know if the content is false, but we can't confirm the truthfulness of facts. Maybe inaccurete is a wrong word, sorry, I'm not a native speaker :P. &mdash;Pórokhov Порох|undefined 03:39, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   11:10, 29 December 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:10, 5 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.