Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evangelical intelligentsia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. sufficient consensus  DGG ( talk ) 05:13, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Evangelical intelligentsia

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't appear to me to be a notable topic. Google Scholar doesn't bring up much related to it and the top results of Bing and Google are mirrors the Wikipedia page and blog posts. The newspaper link above mainly gives press releases about a 2008 study that apparently used the term. Sizeofint (talk) 07:39, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 09:21, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 09:21, 20 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Seems to be a neologism which has not caught on. Besides that the qualifications seem to be very subjective.  It can also be looked at as the intersection of two things, so OR although not WP generated OR. Kitfoxxe (talk) 17:17, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete It seems to be a term used in and coined by a study and resulting 2008 report. No evidence for this neologism attaining notable usage beyond that report, and the report itself has no Wikipedia article. Nor is their any evidence that any of the persons cited in the article as being "members" ("members" of what?) are anything more than a list of names taken from the report, names that the report concluded could be included amongst its self-defined "Evangelical intelligentsia" (i.e., there is no third party confirmation). Tiptoethrutheminefield (talk) 21:05, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO. Graham (talk) 20:00, 23 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.