Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evangelina Olivarez


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  00:11, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Evangelina Olivarez

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

User:Scope creep sent this to draft space but it was edit warred back by the creator without any improvement. It is a stats article masquerading as a sportsperson biography and the subject fails WP:NTENNIS and WP:GNG anyway! Following a recent RfC, Fed Cup was removed from NTENNIS so her 3 matches in the Fed Cup cannot be used as a keep argument on its own.

I've searched extensively for sources and can't find anything to justify an article. Even this Filipino search yielded nothing. I found a passing mention in The Manila Times but that won't be enough. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:03, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Tennis,  and Philippines.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:03, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable. No effective references.   scope_creep Talk  17:24, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete there is no sign of notability here at all.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:56, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. LSGH (talk) (contributions) 04:23, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete No reliable sources present, lacks notability. Timetraveller80 (talk) 16:14, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:BIO per nom. SBKSPP (talk) 01:16, 27 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.