Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evangeline's


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 06:24, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

Evangeline's

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable retailer lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:COMPANY.  ttonyb (talk) 03:42, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep This business is profiled in the 1986 book "Pelican Guide to Sacramento and the Gold Country." I found articles in the Sacramento Bee in 1989, 1995, 1996, 1998 and 2008.  I see a 1989 article in the Contra Costa Times.  Disclosure:  I have shopped at Evangeline's many times over the years.  Cullen328 (talk) 04:39, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Coverage in local journals is hardly 'significant coverage in secondary sources'. Google hits tend to either point to own websites or to travel websites. This shop would fit neatly into a travel guide like the Pelican Guide you mention, which WP is not, of course. Asnac (talk) 12:19, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 02:14, 22 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. The guides do confirm the existence of this retailer, which is good as far as it goes - but does nothing to establish notability.UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 19:39, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.