Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evangeline Spracklin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 23:13, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Evangeline Spracklin

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not appear to be notable at this time. References one and three are both the same and just a passing mention and no in depth coverage. Reference two is a mention of a high school basketball game. Four is unreliable IMDB. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:48, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 23:18, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 23:18, 25 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete not notable. Lightburst (talk) 23:21, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

KEEP. This is an important american artist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:602:8280:3C00:89B2:9EB3:A33C:363A (talk) 02:16, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete No in depth coverage, fails GNG. ~ EDDY  ( talk / contribs )~ 17:17, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete extraordinary claims need sources. When you are lauding a person in half for being a high school basketball player they are almost certainly not notable. If she did make "valuable contributions to the film industry" we need sourcing to show this.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:45, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as wp not selfpromotion. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:41, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Not enough sources to meet WP:GNG. Nika2020 (talk) 12:13, 30 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Article should not be deleted, while a cult figure of lesser notoriety, evangiline “vange” spraklun is a well known internet personality as well as a valuable contributor to the film industry — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.40.177.87 (talk) 05:13, 26 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.