Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evangelos Mantoulidis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  16:44, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Evangelos Mantoulidis

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The person has not received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. The sources are from the education institution he established and from a book store (where he isn't mentioned). C messier (talk) 09:25, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete; I agree with your assessment. Would an article on the school Mantoulidis created have better chances to survive the notability test? Maybe some of the article's content could be salvaged to write an article on the school (if it is notable). --Arbraxan (talk) 10:13, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Mar11 (talk) 16:54, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Mar11 (talk) 16:54, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. Mar11 (talk) 16:54, 28 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. A worthy teacher, but sources of notability are not there. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:35, 28 June 2016 (UTC).
 * Delete. Inadequately sourced. The proper criterion for this seems to be WP:GNG rather than WP:PROF but the reliable in-depth sourcing needed to pass GNG is not present. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:16, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as examining this still found nothing at all for his own convincing notability. SwisterTwister   talk  07:04, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment much of this subject's work would be pre any significant WWW/online so I am curious as to how concerns about sources not being there have been checked, or are such just relying only on the current article's state ?  Aoziwe (talk) 12:54, 6 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.