Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evans High School (Georgia)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep -- JForget  01:15, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Evans High School (Georgia)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Aside from being highly POV and including trivial information like the years various teams won championships, fails WP:SCHOOL for its lack of reliable encyclopedic material. Biruitorul (talk) 03:56, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. The championship data is best understood as an assertion of notability. --Eastmain (talk) 04:22, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.   —Eastmain (talk) 04:22, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - large high school. Multiple state sports championships and alumni clearly establishes notability. Plenty of secondary sources available for article expansion too. TerriersFan (talk) 04:47, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. It definitely needs some rewriting for tone, and to get rid of alot of trivia, but the overall subject is article-worthy. --Elonka 04:51, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. TerriersFan pretty much summed it up. It's not a great article yet, but deletion isn't the answer and WP:SCHOOL is only a proposed policy that still doesn't seem to have a consensus. HDow (talk) 06:36, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep as additions to article since nomination have made this a pass for WP:N. Sting au  Buzz Me...   11:18, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep and cleanup The athletics section is a tad long and there's not much information on the rest of the school, however it is certainly notable. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 16:40, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Easily meets the second primary criteria of WP:SCHOOL Adam McCormick (talk) 20:58, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep as notable. That Athletics section is irritating, should be converted from a billboard to a list. Noroton (talk) 22:17, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I gave my best effort at fixing the list. The article is like a sports organization with a school attached. Noroton (talk) 23:02, 11 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.