Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eve Laurence (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy Keep. w L &lt;speak&middot;check&gt; 18:57, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Eve Laurence

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Doesn't pass WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 11:34, 22 April 2007 (UTC) *Keep I don't see what has changed since the last AfD, which was less than a month ago..  Eliminator JR Talk  13:20, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Reluctant delete I don't agree with the nominators mass-cull but in this case I can't find any sources to defend her -  irides centi   (talk to me!)  12:02, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * You don't agree with my mass cull of non-notable articles? Epbr123 12:27, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I agree, clean-up is needed everywhere in wikipedia. If someone decides to get rid of non-noteable articles, for whatever reason, we should be glad.Dr bab 12:59, 22 April 2007 (UTC). (However, this article was considered for deletion only a few weeks ago. Is it necessary to re-list it already? I am unfamiliar with the subject of the article, so I don't wish to vote either way.)
 * It has since been decided that the number of films an actress has appeared in doesn't establish her notability. Epbr123 13:21, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Ah, I missed that. Might have been worth mentioning in the nomination.  !Vote struck.  Eliminator JR  Talk  13:23, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep Recently survived AfD. Notability "criteria" are in a constant state of flux due in part to the nominator. Literalistically applying the "criteria" of the moment to delete articles on minor celebrities is an abuse of the term "notability." Dekkappai 18:01, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep per above.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.