Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eve Laurence (3rd nomination)

Eve Laurence

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. w L &lt;speak&middot;check&gt; 05:36, 2 July 2009 (UTC) AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:PORNBIO. One nomination in 2007 and that's it for this retired actress. Does not have significant coverage in reliable sources and random editors keep inserting BLP sensitive information without the support of reliable sources (because they probably don't exist). Morbidthoughts (talk) 19:30, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Morbidthoughts (talk) 19:31, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  --  I 'mperator 19:45, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: She's retired? Is there somewhere public where this is mentioned? Tabercil (talk) 21:35, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I consistently read from people claiming to be Laurence that she is still in the industry, but I have not seen any new films with her in them.


 * Weak keep This is based on interpretation of policy. She barely passes the first criteria of WP:PORNBIO, by her AVN win, but could possibly fail the Biographies of living persons policy for being known for one event. Most porn stars (other than ones who are of High importance to WP:P*) do not get coverage outside industry news sources, so it is difficult to find significant coverage. If she passes BLP1E and is found notable, policy states that notability is not temporary.
 * Comment Just wanted to note that she was nominated for an award but did not win it. Morbidthoughts (talk) 05:13, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Comment: Couldn't find a way to comment on this issue however I thought it may be more viable to edit the page and add a 'comment'? I've had business dealings with Eve Laurence [ redacted ] in the past and I know that she hasn't retired (can be confirmed on her official myspace page (www.myspace.com/evelaurence). In relation to the other section about evelaurence.com and this new evelaurence.biz update by user angelfallsent, it can be confirmed by viewing her official myspace. One again, having dealings with her, I was the first css coder for her myspace layout until personal circumstances forced me to drop the project. That started back in 2005 in which I had access to a heap of unreleased content, mainly 'personal photoshoots' IE. non-nude as [ redacted ], and video journals (as Eve Laurence). I obtained the journals as originally I was asked to code her official site (originally evelaurence.com) but declined because I didn't have backend coding experience at the time. Hopefully this information may help with this issue of deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.131.199.241 (talk) 12:15, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:11, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * DeleteChecking her two main names: AVN, ; Xbiz . Envi on XBIZ keeps returning hits for "environment", searched as keyword . Nothing on fleshbot. I don't see anything vaguely resembling significant coverage. Since she didn't win the award, fails Crit 1. Nothing even suggesting she hits or approaches any of the other additionals. Horrorshowj (talk) 01:33, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete As above, it appears that this article fails both the project criteria as well as the general criteria. Gigs (talk) 02:31, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per those above. Subject fails to meet inclusion criteria. لenna  vecia  15:36, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Lack of secondary reliable independent sources. Non-notable per WP:PORNBIO. Algébrico (talk) 02:56, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.