Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eve Vorley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to David Sullivan (businessman). Star  Mississippi  16:58, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Eve Vorley

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

BLP1E. Football club directors are not inherently notable and by coverage this is a pure BLP1E as the appointment of a porn/glamour performer caused some noise at the time. Beyond that, nothing. Not by her real name or alias Spartaz Humbug! 12:37, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Sportspeople, Football,  and England. Shellwood (talk) 12:56, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Shellwood (talk) 13:00, 4 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Sexuality and gender.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  15:00, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:GNG, WP:ENT, and WP:CREATIVE. No significant coverage of her as a former glamour model, pornographic actress, nor film director. She being an English football club director is considered to be WP:ONEEVENT. — Young Forever (talk)   15:54, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Redirect to David_Sullivan_(businessman): where she is mentioned; merge what's necessary. Not opposed to keep, given existing coverage - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)  21:12, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 15:38, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Redirect as above. GiantSnowman 15:41, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Redirect to David_Sullivan_(businessman): Subject lacks the needed sustained coverage to meet the WP:GNG and does not meet WP:CREATIVE. Redirect as a WP:ATD. Let&#39;srun (talk) 19:39, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Weak keep I don't see a problem with the article, there is enough online although it's heavily WP:TABLOID. Govvy (talk) 10:11, 8 July 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.