Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evelyn Smythe (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to List of Doctor Who supporting characters. Daniel (talk) 23:59, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Evelyn Smythe
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

A minor spin-off Companion from Doctor Who. While generally notable in universe, I can't find many sources displaying outside notability in a BEFORE. She's listed at the Companions article, so a redirect there could work as an ATD. Pokelego999 (talk) 23:59, 14 October 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Still unsure whether this article should be blanked (as in creating a regular Redirect) or fully Deleted. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:35, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Science fiction and fantasy. Pokelego999 (talk) 23:59, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Blank and redirect to . This looks like entirely unsourced fancruft to me. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 05:13, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete as lacking reliable sources. A redirect is cheap, per WP:ATD. Shooterwalker (talk) 17:04, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Redirect to List of Doctor Who supporting characters - Minor character that only appeared in spinoff material. No significant coverage in reliable sources to pass the WP:GNG. The character is already listed on the appropriate character list, so redirecting there is sufficient. Rorshacma (talk) 17:15, 22 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Redirect to List of Doctor Who supporting characters as AtD, fails GNG no WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject diretly and indepth. Article reads as fancruft.  // Timothy :: talk  11:04, 25 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.