Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Event Horizons BBS


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. significant coverage in reliable sources demonstrated 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 16:23, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Event Horizons BBS

 * – ( View AfD View log )

There's no question this BBS existed, but it doesn't pass WP:GNG. There are a few small references to it based on its porn category but there's hardly any coverage of it.

See also concurrent AFDs for Jim Maxey, Oregon State Media, Inc. tedder (talk) 18:34, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:49, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:49, 22 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Some passing mentions in blogs but not much in the way of WP:RS. The only thing close would be Wired but even this is just a few sentences about profitability and porn. LizardJr8 (talk) 21:13, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, decent amount of coverage in various sources.-- Surv1v4l1st ▌Talk 17:39, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for . Can you tell me if there is some depth of coverage in any of the sources? I think all of the books are basically a mention, Wired is two paragraphs. The Oregonian is 500 words and should count for significant coverage, any others? tedder (talk) 19:00, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks. In addition to the WIRED and Oregonian articles, the article in Boardwatch is over 1,600 words and covers the 3D astronomy simulator they developed, in addition to the other aspects of the BBS.  The entry in The Joy of Cybersex is a couple paragraphs.  Some of the books were just a paragraph or a blurb, but added details.-- Surv1v4l1st ▌Talk 21:22, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:19, 30 June 2021 (UTC) Keep per improvements. Thanks, nice work! -Pete Forsyth (talk) 19:18, 2 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.