Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Everest Public High School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Withdrawn by nominator. tedder (talk) 00:37, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Everest Public High School

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Newly created local charter high school where all sources cover a battle over education, without going into significant detail on the school itself. Article has also been tagged for multiple issues including COI since August. Article is currently a stub with an infobox. Optigan13 (talk) 06:32, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. All high schools are notable. Stubs are harmless. Lots of references, and the articles about disputes over location are valid references from reliable sources. - Eastmain (talk) 06:55, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  —Eastmain (talk) 07:03, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  —Eastmain (talk) 07:03, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Do you have a link to any guideline on "All High schools are notable"? I only see an incomplete essay High Schools, and a failed proposal Notability (schools). Right now I still see this as failing general notability as the references all discuss the dispute over accreditation, and not the school directly. -Optigan13 (talk) 07:07, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Inherently notable as a high school whose existence is verifiable (see Articles_for_deletion/Common_outcomes), and passes WP:GNG in any event.--Arxiloxos (talk) 07:29, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Per Articles for deletion/Common outcomes, verifiable high schools are usually kept. High schools typically gain sufficient coverage to satisfy WP:N. Edison (talk) 18:48, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Meh, I'm still concerned looking that all the sources are from the same writer, for the same local paper, largely revolving around accreditation and site selection, but there's no point in keeping this one going. Feel free to close this one, and block as an WP:ORGNAME. Article still has a host of issues, COI in the creation being one. -Optigan13 (talk) 22:45, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep per Articles_for_deletion/Common_outcomes and WP:SCHOOLS (essay/failed guideline). We have few hard and fast rules here, but articles on high schools are the closest thing we have to inherent notability.  Recent examples of keeps of high school AfDs per these guides, e.g., Articles for deletion/BEST High School (Kirkland, Washington), Articles for deletion/Summit School (Queens, New York) (3rd nomination), Articles for deletion/Calvary Baptist Academy, New Braunfels, Texas, and Articles for deletion/Poland Central School.  In Articles for deletion/Poland Central School, Phil Bridger also commented: "I don't recall any article being deleted in the last couple of years about a high school that is verified to exist, so, in this case, keeping certainly is the common outcome."  I haven't been watching for years, but I haven't seen any cases either.  Glad to see that article has improved since nomination, however.--Milowent (talk) 22:38, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.