Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Everest Syndrome


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Educational_technology.  MBisanz  talk 13:30, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Everest Syndrome

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable neologism, very few citations or references other than by the inventor. Most searches for "everest syndrome" yield something else. Vectro (talk) 06:28, 22 November 2016 (UTC)


 * This may be irrelevant but did you come here from reddit too? Support deletion or merge, btw Koopatrev (talk; contrib) 06:42, 22 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Looks like jargon known only to a small in-group or clique of teachers and virtually no-one else. I don't think there's sufficient notability to allow for it to be kept or merged. Support deletion. Maswimelleu (talk) 09:25, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Thirty plus years in education, many as a leader in classroom tech initiatives. This phenomenon exists but I've never heard it referred to by this term. It may belong in an article discussing technology in the classroom but doesn't seem enough for a separate page. (Yep, reddit TIL) TBoaN (talk) 01:33, 23 November 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:18, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:26, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:26, 30 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Educational_technology or possibly Educational_technology. Notability as standalone term not established.  Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 20:36, 5 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.