Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Everett L. Storey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Davewild (talk) 18:06, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Everett L. Storey

 * – ( View AfD View log )

After substantial searching, there appear to be no sources discussing this man that are not involved in the business of peddling his so-called CellFood. The US Patents Quarterly lists a lawsuit naming him, and he's listed in Ulrich's, so his existence (at least as the publisher of West) is demonstrated, but notability is most definitely not; the one book that discusses him in any detail (Blue Diamond Story) is self-published poppycock, so no use as a source. Fails WP:GNG through lack of independent sources. Yunshui (talk) 12:00, 18 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete This is really a WP:COATRACK for "Cellfood", a fraudulent food supplement. Plenty of people think that there never was such a person, and it's pretty clear he had nothing to do with the Manhattan Project. The Deuterium Freedom Act of 1985 mentioned in the article is a hoax. Mangoe (talk) 16:57, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm not finding any reliable sources on Google news or books to verify the claims made in the article. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:09, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as a hoax (even if a person of that name ever existed). Everett seem to becoming a perennial- has been deleted a few times before, see Articles for deletion/Everett L Storey Crusoe8181 (talk) 01:11, 19 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:19, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:19, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:20, 19 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails notability guidelines: no reliable sources visible on a Google Books or Scholar search; no sources for the claims in the article. -- 202.124.74.16 (talk) 07:44, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete- Subject is not notable.Vincelord (talk) 16:23, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.