Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Everett Robinson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. v/r - TP 01:42, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Everett Robinson

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Another Alex de-PROD without a giving any reason. Individual is not notable. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:40, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs)  05:49, 20 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. I added some references. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:49, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment- Appears to be this entry at findagrave; military service does not meet WP:Soldier; no helpful criteria covered, but may assist further searches. Dru of Id (talk) 06:33, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - championship-winning manager. However, it's only one championship, and for that I have to ask: what level of baseball were the Madisonville Miners at? If they were AAA, AA or even A, I'd argue winning the championship with them establishes notability; if not an A-level team, though, it probably doesn't. - The Bushranger One ping only 07:05, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Madisonville Miners were a Class-D league.. similar to todays rookie leagues. Spanneraol (talk) 14:26, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:08, 20 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete... this guy doesnt quite do it for me. Spanneraol (talk) 14:37, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep person has achived multiple titles, I feel meets the requirements for both WP:GNG and WP:STUB. – Phoenix B 1of3 (talk) 19:23, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Nowhere in GNG or STUB does it say that "achieving multiple titles" passes those thresholds. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:25, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Rcsprinter  (whisper)  19:33, 27 October 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.