Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Everfound (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Links provided by HotHat have demonstrated sufficient coverage as required by GNG - but the content in them should be added to the article when possible to improve the article. (non-admin closure) Steven   Zhang  Help resolve disputes! 00:18, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Everfound (band)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:N, WP:GNG or WP:BAND. Possibly a case of WP:TOOSOON Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:16, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:20, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:20, 9 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep - I was shocked browsing through here to see this band listed. Given, the page is poorly done, but I can vouch that they have some songs in circulation on national radio stations (K-LOVE). Just upon a quick Google search, they've been covered and/or interviewed by several web magazines and notable websites, and are signed to a major label, which is heavily promoting their upcoming album. They've been around for several years, and have had several releases. —Maktesh (talk) 19:01, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - They have met BAND No. 1 with CCM Magazine, Indie Vision Music first interview, Indie Vision Music second interview and Christian Music Zine interview. It meets with GNG because all these sources are reliable secondary sources who are independent of the artist themselves, and they have been met with significant coverage. Furthermore, their new album Everfound has been reviewed by BREATHEcast, Christian Music Zine, HM, Jesus Freak Hideout twice, New Release Tuesday and Worship Leader. This band is notable and noteworthy for inclusion in this encyclopedia.HotHat (talk) 04:32, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment I don't believe that album reviews meet the requirement of making the band notable. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:46, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment Thanks for posting those, HotHat. I was getting ready to go collect the links! And no, reviews don't make a band notable in and of themselves, but it shows coverage and attention from notable and reliable sources. —Maktesh (talk) 14:44, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment I just added in the reviews for good measure, but the first four sources in the first sentence make them N, GNG and BAND.HotHat (talk) 21:57, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.