Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evermeet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. Deli nk (talk) 15:26, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Evermeet

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable fictional place. prod removed by User:208.253.100.91 without comment, so here we are at AfD. Mikeblas 15:29, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Here we are again, indeed. Notable location within the Forgotten Realms. Hazy memories suggest to me that it was also the setting of at least one Elaine Cunningham novel; perhaps a Forgotten Realms fan can clue me in.  If the people who submit these articles would source them better, they could be better defended. BOZ 16:33, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
 * D'oh! That couldn't have been more obvious.  Thank you, Google! Evermeet: Island of Elves it is.  BOZ 16:35, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Per BOZ -- ZeWrestler  Talk 23:47, 1 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep, with a possible eventual merge. I'm less certain of Evermeet's eventual notability than Menzoberranzan (also prod'ed by Mikeblas), but if out-of-universe information proves difficult to find, it should be merged into an article on Faerun instead of deletion.  Tentatively, I'd suggest Northwest Faerûn, and think that many of the more minor locations that currently have articles should probably be merged as sections into articles linked from the main Faerun page.  Anyway, I know from some friends that there are is in fact a wide corpus of "behind the scenes" material on D&D from generally reliable sources (as in, not just the company itself), so I think it's possible to cover this topic well.  The fact that it hasn't yet...  well, Wikipedia is not on a deadline.  (Note: Came here due to User:208.253.100.91 leaving a message on my talk page.) SnowFire 05:01, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * keep but apply WP:WAF and see what it looks like then. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:06, 11 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.