Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eversheds Sutherland


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. See WP:SOFTDELETE. Kurykh (talk) 05:34, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Eversheds Sutherland

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about a firm which has a very large advertising component. If the advertising was removed there would one sentence left. scope_creep (talk) 18:00, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:39, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:39, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:35, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:35, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:16, 20 April 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak delete as reputable international publications discuss the firm, however many are press releases under the surface. Burroughs&#39;10 (talk) 04:54, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:46, 28 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.