Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eversince


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. --F a ng Aili 說嗎? 01:40, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Eversince
This article is about a form of Newspeak which appears to have been created by the uploader, note the article's creator and the name mentioned on the linked website are the same. Our official policy on such articles is: "If you invent the word "frindle" or a new type of dance move, it is not article material until a secondary source reports on it"; I can find no secondary sources. Rje 00:15, 25 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete, neologism. Kimchi.sg | talk 00:26, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete good nom - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 01:10, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:NEO, WP:NFT, WP:VANITY. Morgan Wick 03:18, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. DarthVad e r 03:41, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:NEO, WP:NFT, etc. dbtfz talk 04:16, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Delete per WP:NEO, WP:NFT, WP:VANITY Aeon 06:21, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete nonsense. It doesn't even belong in Singlish M1ss1ontomars2k4 14:09, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as complete nonsense. I think this is simply a hoax or a bad joke. J I P  | Talk 17:27, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete unless references are provided for it as required. Tyrenius 17:55, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as an unsourced neologism, then do the frindle.--Isotope23 19:04, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as a nonsense article. *drew 06:54, 26 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.