Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Every Blue Moon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:50, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Every Blue Moon

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article is in sorry shape, and will require a rewrite. Basically everything failed verification, but that's not an AfD-worthy offense. I nominate this for deletion because I don't believe either company here (because I have found nothing indicating that these two are in any way related) is notable enough for me to actually do said rewrite. For Board Administration, there is this, already in the article, that mentions the company exists and has a couple of client; this, also in the article, that mentions Wale founded this company along with a few other people; and this, discussing how the company and one of its clients fell out with each other. Three articles from two sources, all three of which are trivial coverage: the only one that is plausibly significant is the last one, but that focuses on Fat Trel, with only as much coverage of the Board Administration as pertains to that artist. As for Every Blue Moon, there's the three sources in the article (all from the same day), all three of which cover it very trivially (unless you want to argue that a page consisting only of two sentences and a quote constitutes significant coverage, which I do not), plus some other trivial coverage such as a SoundCloud station, and this thing that has nothing to do with the record label. Even if we considered them together (which we should not, because they aren't related), they fail GNG and WP:NCORP. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 23:09, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment: Original author is a single-purpose account, has been given a spam username block and admits to cooperating in their editing with a coworker, . I suggest that both have an undisclosed conflict of interest. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 23:14, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 23:16, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 23:16, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 23:16, 1 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete, per nom. Definitely doesn't have significant news coverage, or anywhere near it. = paul2520 (talk) 17:51, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of notability. \\\Septrillion:- &#8237;  10 Eleventeen 22:53, 6 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.