Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Every Young Man's Battle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy keep - article has been improved, nom has withdrawn  Nancy  talk  17:11, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Every Young Man's Battle
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No evidence of notability. No real claim to notability either, but references to the "success" of its predecessor and the fact there was a "spin-off" makes me inclined to think it may have been successful and therefore notability may be demonstrable. Dweller (talk) 15:50, 16 December 2008 (UTC) - Nominator requests speedy close. Article now well verified. A good result, thanks all. --Dweller (talk) 16:55, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 *  Speedy keep . Should be marked as unreferenced not AfD. gnews "Every Young Man's Battle".  Linguist At Large  16:03, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Changed speedy keep to keep, because it was pointed out that I was misusing speedy keep.  Linguist At Large  16:23, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep – Reviews by the Rolling Stone – Atlanta Journal – and Boston Globe, to name a few and shown here, does tend to give credence to Notability. Also ranked at #69, for its genre at Amazon.com, which is impressive.  I’ll cite the Rolling Stone’s article in the piece and see what happens. ShoesssS Talk 16:42, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I added two more references as well.  Linguist</b> At <b style="color:#600;">Large</b> </b> 16:53, 16 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.