Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Everything Goes (game show)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Shout out to for making something of this article. (non-admin closure) Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 03:53, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Everything Goes (game show)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

First source is just a blurb about the network that only mentions the show in passing. Second is valid, but I could find nothing better. If the network doesn't even have its own Wikipedia article, then how can the show possibly be notable? Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:10, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:10, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Citations are enough for WP:GNG. Assessing the game show based on the notability of the network is the same as saying Grandma Got Run Over by a Reindeer isn't notable because the album it was released on doesn't have an article, and neither does the artist (Elmo & Patsy). The group redirects to Elmo Shropshire. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Donaldd23 (talk • contribs)
 * You know damn well WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a reason to keep. There are two sources, one of which only dedicates a sentence to the show. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:20, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I wasn't saying KEEP because of the other article. I was just pointing out that you are saying the show isn't notable because the network isn't. Which is not a valid argument to delete. I was merely pointing out that other things that are 'children' of a larger 'parent' are notable, even if the parent isn't. Donald D23   talk to me  01:25, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I still don't see how the citations are sufficient if one is barely about the show at all. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:42, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:45, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I've seen you in other TV AFDs. What do you think here? Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:00, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
 * This one is a bit tough. I'd like to see more sources being used for this article. Only two sources is sort of stretching the concept of "widespread" coverage. My personal opinion on these obscure game show articles is that they're probably better off on Wikia, but you can take that with a grain of salt.  ~XyNq tc 05:28, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - the network has its own Wiki page under Playboy TV, Escapade just got bought/rebranded to Playboy Channel. The show ran continuously through the switch, infobox makes it seems like it jumped network. You can't expect the internet to have much from the 80s. Regardless of that The News Journal, Olathe News, Tampa Bay Times & Associated Press all have coverage. AP article ran in multiple papers nation wide(saw over half dozen on newspapers.com). The first article cited does not just mention show in passing, and significantly more than just a sentence. Nearly the entire first column is about the show, which is nearly half the article. Either way nearly 10 years on air, who knows what else is out there offline, but WP:GNG shown to pass with just the stuff available online. WikiVirusC (talk) 11:26, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep - I am satisfied the sources found by other nominators demonstrate significant coverage and notability standards. MaxnaCarter (talk) 13:32, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment - I have now expanded the article to include all four sources found by @WikiVirusC. Thanks for finding these. The article is now significantly improved and I would love for @TenPoundHammer to please consider whether they would please withdraw their nomination now these sources are not only located, but even added to the article. MaxnaCarter (talk) 03:51, 4 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.