Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Everywhere I Go (Song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 03:27, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Everywhere I Go (Song)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This song doesn't appear to be notable as per WP:SONGS. The article itself (excluding the infobox) is pretty much one sentence, so I'm not sure it justifies keeping. Bennydigital (talk) 14:42, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

I have added more info to the song. Please keep the song on Wikipedia, other people can also edit it to give more info. monkeylegend (talk) 16:49, 21 March 1011 (UTC)


 * Don't worry, this process allows a week to get an article up to scratch before anything's done to it, and allows many editors to review it. My personal suggestion would be either find more notability (did it chart highly? Lots of usage in other media? Any other good reason?), or even if the article doesn't stay, my suggestion would be to merge your hard work with the main album article, so either way, don't see your time as misspent! Really do have a look over at WP:SONGS where there's tons of good advice on how to put together a single entry. Alternatively, feel free to hit me, or any other editor up for assistance. We've all been here, and we all want to help (mostly...) Bennydigital (talk) 17:14, 21 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. WP:NSONGS is clear that individual songs should not have articles unless they are in some way notable, such as having charted. This one does not appear to be notable so at best there should be only a redirect to the artist or album article. The content added to the article since nomination is an unreferenced review of its content and style which, as WP:OR, is actually a degradation rather than improvement. Several other songs from the same album with apparently similar lack of notability have also been given articles and I will review them and consider reducing them to redirects; that could have happened here without discussion. RichardOSmith (talk) 19:21, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 22 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete; exist purely as advertising for the band. WTF (talk) 23:36, 22 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Neutral; As the article is right now, it clearly has no business staying on wikipedia. However, with proper editing, I know I can bring the article up to standards. I have almost entirely edited the articles for Hear Me Now (song) and Been To Hell, both quality articles. I will edit this article and get it to be a keeper before the week is over. Ground  Z3R0   002  19:55, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
 * This is not about the quality of the writing, it is about whether inclusion criteria for the subject are met. The song has not been on any of Billboard's charts, which would have been a good start. Unless some other demonstration of notability as suggested by WP:NSONG can be provided you'd probably be wasting your time. (While we're at it, Been To Hell is a nice article about a song that appears to have no business here either.) RichardOSmith (talk) 20:09, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Been to Hell as it is, is very borderline notable because it is a single and has a music video as well as has been covered in many reliable third party sources. However I do see that it should chart to be entirely notable, and the single was only released last week. I am quite sure the track will chart somewhere in the following weeks. For this article, I do not believe it has charted and there's no chance of it charting so late after it's release so I will go ahead and endorse deleting and check to see if there's sufficient coverage for it. Ground  Z3R0   002  23:00, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
 * If not notable enough to keep it's own page, I still think it would be worth merging into the album article, especially if GroundZ3Ro puts in some work on it. Bennydigital (talk) 08:31, 24 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Redirect to album article, per WP:NSONGS treatment of non-notable songs. Rlendog (talk) 19:20, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, after extensive research on the song I have not found a single reason to keep this article. There is not sufficient coverage anywhere, even on blogs or other unreliable sources. There is no single cover. There is no chart history. There is not even an indication this really was a single for the album. There was a music video released, but I believe this was simply a promotional single and was not a lead single. This is definitely not notable and there is no merit for an article here, possibly not even a spot on the album page and band tab showing it is a single, I don't believe it is and there's no evidence it is. Ground Z3R0   002  20:35, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.