Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evgenij Sviatchenko


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 16:52, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Evgenij Sviatchenko

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No references, no indication of notability that I can see, but perhaps that is because I don't read Ukrainian. Apparently created by an editor connected to Sergei Sviatchenko. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 08:22, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment: it seems that this is part of long-term pattern of promotional editing surrounding (Sergei) Sviatchenko, who is probably notable (though I'm having the greatest difficult finding enough sources to confirm that). Apart from this, which was "Created on request of Sergei Sviatchenko", other affected pages are Less collage, now also at AfD) and – to a lesser extent – that on his son. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:52, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 11:49, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 11:49, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 11:49, 21 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete - probably notable (PROF / architect), if the CV information is correct. Sourcing, however, would probably be mainly in Russian (as would much of citations of his work). There is a case for TNT at current state, and it fails WP:V without any reference.Icewhiz (talk) 12:55, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 13:00, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 13:00, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 13:00, 21 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment -- I have no idea whether he was or was not important. The number of articles may be impressive, if they are academic ones (not merely in magazines).  However the number of red-links points to deletion.  Peterkingiron (talk) 18:15, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete as it is completely unsourced, and I couldn't find any WP:RS to back it up. There might be sources in Russian, but then again, I note that the only other article is on da.wiki Theredproject (talk) 23:32, 26 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.