Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evidence (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. J04n(talk page) 16:22, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Evidence (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NFILMS, director, producer, and actors are all non-notable, barely any coverage, low-grossing Revolution1221 (talk) 22:53, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:00, 1 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep and allow this brand new article to be improved over time and through regular editing. As it was sent to AFD only SIX minutes after being created, I would think that a diligent WP:BEFORE may not have been followed, specially as my own quick look found that it seems to have a number of genre reviews, leading me to believe we may find some that may prove usable.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 05:29, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. I've cleaned the article up some and while it still needs work (doesn't every article?), it passes notability guidelines via coverage in multiple RS. Tokyogirl79  (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:54, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Kudos to Tokyogirl79 for taking improving the project through regular editing to heart.THAT's how we build an encyclopedia! Thank you.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 20:07, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep looks good in current (improved) form, sourced, and am also concerned about knee-jerk Afd process for new articles, shouldn't they be tagged for improvement first??? Boogerpatrol (talk) 12:24, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.