Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evidence of absence


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. Unproductive and not funny. Please use userspace rather than actual encyclopedia processes for attempts at humor. See WP:AN.  Sandstein  17:52, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Evidence of absence

 * – ( View AfD View log )

There is an absence of evidence for Evidence of absence. One must prove that there is no evidence of absence of evidence for evidence of absence, which connotes we must have an absence of Evidence of absence. :) --  Dennis The Tiger  (Rawr and stuff) 02:14, 1 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Evident delete No absence is good absence. ;) Bulldog73 talk da contribs  go rando 02:18, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes? –Fredddie™ 02:42, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete due to the evident evidence of absence of evidence for the concept of evidence of absence. Chris the Paleontologist  (talk • contribs) 02:47, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.