Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evil owen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Deleted, as per WP:SNOWBALL. The Anome 00:28, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Evil owen, Evil Owen, Evil Owen.
Deprod2; prod reason was WP:NN and WP:VAIN, and I agree. --ais523 15:19, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * As the first prod tagger, I have to say delete. --Merope 15:21, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. (I was prod2er). Upcoming movie from an unknown director, from a studio that doesn't seem to exist (website is an "under construction" page from Network Solutions). IMDB has never heard of film or director. Neither has Google. Non-notable, crystal-ballism, unverifiable. Fan-1967 15:22, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete the faster the better Wildthing61476 15:23, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment PHANTOM FEATURES appears to be a near duplicate of this. --ais523 15:24, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Fan1967, I've listed PHANTOM FEATURES below. NawlinWiki 15:25, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as its a crystal ball article Lurker talk 15:36, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom; can always be recreated in the unlikely event that this movie becomes a big hit. --M @ r ē ino 16:21, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and crystal ball --Wafulz 17:19, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Author created Evil Owen. with the same content, which I have added to the deletion list. -- Merope 19:13, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
 * ... and Evil Owen (without a period). Fan-1967 19:21, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Interestingly, his user talk page says he's been blocked. I guess it didn't stick. -- Merope 19:23, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Just a 24-hour block. It ended an hour or two ago. Fan-1967 19:26, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Update. He just bought himself another 48, for removing the AFD tag from one of the clone articles. Fan-1967 19:42, 4 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. Useless stuff we're dealing with here. Might as well delete and protect it all, and figure out some way to get this guy to contribute meaningfully to Wiki. Logical2u 19:28, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I speedied the dot one (idiotic), and redirected the bad caps one to the proper caps one. Syrthiss 19:44, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Anyone want to lay odds we're going to need to salt the earth eventually on this one? Fan-1967 20:36, 4 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.