Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evisors


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 07:17, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Evisors

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No indication of notability. Seems to be mostly promotion for a new start up company. Safiel (talk) 04:36, 4 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep While Evisors is a start-up company, there is certainly indication of notability. The Wikipedia article highlights other articles and blogs which have reviewed Evisors including The Globe and Mail, Alexandra Levit's blog, CrunchBase, Mashable, CaseQuestions, The Wharton Journal, and Yahoo News. These reviews are indicative of the notability of Evisors. In addition Evisors has been featured at notable educational conference such as MBA CSC and NACE in addition to helping fund the Mel Penn MBA Scholarship. Furthermore, Evisors' clients include several notable educational i institutions such as Rutgers, McGill, Babson, Emory, University of Houston, Stockton College, and Cambridge. --cL (talk) 19:33, 4 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Yet another 2010 web based startup advertising on Wikipedia.  A puff piece from the hometown paper about how the startup came to be does not establish the sort of significant effect on history, culture, or technology that makes for long term historical notability.  How could it?  It's a 2010 startup.  Other alleged references are tech aggregator sites and spamblogs. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 17:06, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per lack of third party sources. I didn't get any notable mentions on Google and Yahoo. SwisterTwister   talk  23:48, 5 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  — —Tom Morris (talk) 11:34, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.