Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evo Championship Series


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep and move. JForget 02:09, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Evo Championship Series

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Unencyclopedic article that reads more like a rant against the subject rather than providing any actual useful information. A video game tournament by this name exists, but notability is uncertain. NeoChaosX (talk, edits) 18:01, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 18:42, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The current version is Speedy G10, but a previous version was deleted via WP:PROD, which I've put in a request to undelete on account of recent coverage like this. Nifboy (talk) 21:41, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Digging around a bit, I found User:Jeremybox/Evolution Championship Series, a decidedly more neutral (though userfied) article on the subject. Nifboy (talk) 21:59, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Reverted to 2006 version for now, and changing my !vote to  Weak Keep. Nifboy (talk) 06:10, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Articles in gamasutra, gamespot, gamesetwatch, IGN. Should be enough for an article, preferably at Evolution Championship Series. Nifboy (talk) 17:34, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  -- Pcap  ping  08:51, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per Nifboy's sources. SharkD   Talk  09:45, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep – the newly-found sources look good. –MuZemike 22:25, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 * If it is kept, it should definitely be moved to Evolution Championship Series (which is currently a redirect but was previously a duplicate of this one when it was an attack article). NeoChaosX (talk, edits) 23:14, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Sounds OK. SharkD   Talk  04:14, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.