Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evo Technologies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. Tawker 05:21, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Evo Technologies
Was originally a user page. Moved to article namespace and tagged as speedy. Not really a speedy candidate so PRODded. PROD tag removed and a justification put on talk page that reads in part: "If there can be articles about Microsoft, Sun, Dell, etc. there can be articles about our company..." Article appears not to meet WP:CORP. Note: technical nomination after removal of PROD without change to article. No opinion from me. ➨ ≡ Я Ξ  DVΞRS ≡ 19:35, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete no evidence that it meets WP:CORP. Google finds only about 65 unique (200 total) hits, and that includes other companies (a website developer and a maker of softball bats) using the name. Hundreds of companies are jumping into VOIP. Nothing to show this one's notable. Fan1967 20:26, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Sans any verifiable claims of notability, this doesn't appear to meet WP:CORP to me. Regarding the quote above, when Evo Tech is 1% as notable as Google, Sun, Dell, etc., then they justify a page. Heck, even 1/100 of 1%. -- MarcoTolo 20:54, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom.    Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  20:56, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Fan1967. (Notorious4life 21:19, 1 May 2006 (UTC))


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.