Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evodant Interactive


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I recommend reading Identifying reliable sources and Articles for Creation before writing any more about this. czar 08:38, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Evodant Interactive

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is simply a PR advertising business listing, regardless of anything because both WP:NIT is being violated as it's clearly only a business listing, two, none of thid establishes any genuine independent notability and substance; with this said, the links are literally as trivial and unconvincing as it gets because they are not actual significant coverage news, let alone notability. SwisterTwister  talk  22:13, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

WhiskeyZuluXray (talk) 03:15, 5 December 2016 (UTC) I'm not sure how this is any different than https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arkane_Studios, but as this is my first article maybe I'm missing something.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 06:36, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 06:36, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Manitoba-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 06:36, 5 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment - Its rather short, and there's no third party sources, but its not really overly promotional, that's not really the issue here. Sergecross73   msg me  13:15, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

WhiskeyZuluXray (talk) 19:24, 5 December 2016 (UTC) Agreed, I added a relevant narrative section and updated the references since their own website doesn't point to the correct citations.  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete per WP:PROMO with a good doze of WP:TNT; badly promotional article (with ext links in body, a hallmark of poorly written vanity pages). The business itself is non notable. K.e.coffman (talk) 10:02, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e talk 01:09, 12 December 2016 (UTC) WhiskeyZuluXray (talk) 16:11, 12 December 2016 (UTC) As per my previous comment, this page contains more info now than this one - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arkane_Studios. How does this page page warrant deletion and that one doesn't? Other examples of similar pages are: - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_Studios - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artdink - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behaviour_Interactive - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bits_Studios - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coded_Illusions - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crafts_%26_Meister

...to list just a handful.

The 1 external link in the body has been replaced with a reference.

WhiskeyZuluXray (talk) 16:16, 12 December 2016 (UTC) But honestly, with the host of issues the page has had. Go ahead and delete it and I'll start over.
 * Delete Not adhere to Wiki Standards. Light2021 (talk) 18:19, 18 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.