Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evoken


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-02 07:40Z 

Evoken

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

non-notbale band, bandcruft/fancruft, poor sourcing SERSeanCrane 21:29, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages under similar reasoning:



Withdrawing nom, recommend sources listed in support of the article be added to reffs. SERSeanCrane 13:28, 1 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Strong keep satisfies WP:BAND three albums already plus some other stuff (eps, promos etc), has an AMG entry. Also has performed as the head liner of a Dutch festival Spearhead 22:50, 25 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep. Meets WP:MUSIC with two albums on Avantgarde Music. This is also one of the most well-known bands in the funeral doom subgenre. Multiple non-trivial coverage can be found on Google, so verifiability is not a problem.       Prolog 23:12, 25 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Strong keep Notability proved thanks to the sources. Zouavman Le Zouave (Talk to me! • O)))) 00:10, 27 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep because of sources provided and multiple records. --Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 11:02, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as per everything above. Clearly meets WP:Band so nomination on grounds of bandcruft is slightly puzzling. A1octopus 23:41, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep It's all sourced and it meets WP:Band. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by M2K 2 (talk • contribs) 01:07, 2 March 2007 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.