Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 01:26, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Evology

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Seems to be made-up term. No evidence that Evology actually exists, apart from one non-notable blog. sciencewatcher (talk) 22:59, 19 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Even the articles linked to as sources do not use the term, which to me suggests that this is OR. - OldManNeptune⚓ (talk) 23:45, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Seems to be a nonnotable neologism. --Orlady (talk) 03:17, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Original research with no reliable sources to support the existence of this term. Uncle Dick (talk) 17:19, 25 August 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.